Local GLM output-budget result¶
Canonical facts: real Pi through Anvil to one unchanged rc14 backend on two RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q GPUs, TP2, 393,216 context, C1, FP8 KV, adaptive EAGLE [3,5], max reasoning. Warm/cache-uncontrolled. Use the finding for the exact recipe and immutable pins.
Short post¶
Local GLM/Pi test: 16K rescued one capped answer, but not its repeat. Keep 4K. Eight coding runs invalid. https://github.com/fakoli/anvil-serving/blob/main/docs/findings/2026-09-11-glm53-output-budget.md
Reddit title¶
Local GLM through Pi: a larger completion budget did not pass our repeatability gate
Reddit body¶
We tested 4,096 versus 16,384 completion tokens on the same running GLM backend. Valid task successes were 6/8 versus 7/8. The larger budget still ended one reasoning run at its ceiling without a final answer. Eight coding runs were invalid due to fixture contamination and excluded. No default or model setting changed. This small, incomplete panel does not establish a model-wide quality or performance ranking.
Screenshot alt text¶
Two-column local comparison: 4K has six of eight valid tasks pass and two empty capped finals; 16K has seven of eight and one. Eight coding runs excluded. No promotion.
Claim ledger¶
| Claim | Evidence |
|---|---|
| 6/8 versus 7/8; truncations 2 versus 1 | Native records, validity, summary |
| Same backend and restored default | Identity, restoration |
| Fixture gap and no repeated rescue | Friction |